[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:02:29 +0300
From: Roman Yeryomin <roman@...t.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] socket.h: fix SO_* for mips
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 12:14:58AM +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote:
>> > * Roman Yeryomin <roman@...t.com> [2015-07-01 19:27:08 +0300]:
>> >> Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin <roman@...t.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/mips/bits/socket.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> >> arch/powerpc/bits/socket.h | 9 ++++++---
>> >> include/sys/socket.h | 6 +++---
>> >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >
>> >> +#define SO_ACCEPTCONN 0x1009
>> >> +#define SO_PROTOCOL 0x1028
>> >> +#define SO_DOMAIN 0x1029
>> >
>> > i assume these 3 were wrong in generic sys/socket.h
>> > and eveything else is ok, just reordered
>> >
>>
>> Yes, these 3 are added to mips, powerpc and put under ifdef in
>> sys/socket.h to avoid redefines.
>> Other changes in mips bits/socket.h is reordering and rewriting in hex
>> to be somewhat consistent and easily comparable with asm/socket.h
>
> OK. I think it would be good to factor this into two patches then: one
> that makes the minimal change to fix the values, and another that's
> pure cleanup for consistency and reordering.
NP, will submit v2
> I'm somewhat skeptical of the value of cleanup since this is all
> scheduled for overhaul soon, but "soon" keeps getting pushed back so
> in the mean time maybe it's nice to have some cleanup anyway. :-)
right :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
