[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:24:13 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: pkgsrc
* Justin Cormack <justin@...cialbusservice.com> [2015-06-21 13:02:48 +0100]:
> I thought I would try a run of pkgsrc on Alpine as no one has done one
nice
> Full report: http://www.pkgsrc-box.org/reports/current/Alpine/20150619.2335/meta/report.html
> Machine readable version:
> http://www.pkgsrc-box.org/reports/current/Alpine/20150619.2335/meta/report.bz2
these are 404 for me
> Total number of packages: 16431
> Successfully built: 6113
> Failed to build: 750
> Depending on failed package: 8853
> Explicitly broken or masked: 671
> Depending on masked package: 44
>
> Packages breaking the most other packages
>
> Package Breaks Maintainer
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> textproc/libxml2 5523 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
someone should come up with a strategy how to
avoid libxml2 dependencies in unix userspace:
it is a dangerously broken library.
> lang/python27 5115 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
i assume this is caused by the posix namespace
violation in the python posix module.
> x11/libdrm 2730 joerg@...BSD.org
> devel/cmake 1397 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
there should be a way to avoid cmake dependency,
i think it can generate Makefiles so those can
be included in the source for common platforms..
either way cmake is a portability nightmare..
and so many package depend on it :(
> lang/ruby200-base 603 taca@...BSD.org
> audio/alsa-lib 558 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
> lang/ruby193-base 527 taca@...BSD.org
> security/heimdal 436 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
> audio/libsndfile 423 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
> lang/python34 419 pkgsrc-users@...BSD.org
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
