[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 20:55:19 +0200
From: Alex Dowad <alexinbeijing@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] When building, don't use compiler flags which
cause warnings
On 26/05/15 20:47, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:36:45PM +0200, Alex Dowad wrote:
>> This silences some warnings when building with clang.
>> ---
>> Dear Rich Felker,
>>
>> This accomplishes the same thing as the previous patch by "promoting" all
>> warnings to errors. Look better?
> No, it has exactly the same problem -- it treats any spurious warnings
> which the chosen $CC might produce as a failure of the test.
OK, understood. It doesn't look like there is any way to treat ignored
options as errors,
unfortunately.
Thanks for reviewing the patches, AD
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
