musl - Re: musl perf, 20% slower than native build?

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 22:33:35 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>
cc: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: musl perf, 20% slower than native build?

That a_* functions appear in this profile implies they were not inlined, which
is quite strange.  Are you positive -O3 was used for your musl compile?  Can
you check the list of symbols in libc.so (e.g. using nm or `readelf -a`) to
double check?

Thanks.

Alexander

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.