[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:02:50 +0100
From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] sha2: new <sha2.h> header
I think the main point isn't corner cases, the main point is that
those functions (as well-written and useful as they are) are not
standardized to be included in a libc, and that would make
depending on them nonportable and/or hazardous.
I agree with Rich's point: sha2 and other cryptographic functions
have their place in a user library, not in a libc.
--
Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
