[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:10:58 -0500
From: Glenn Weinberg <glenn@...nitive-electronics.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Further limits/stdint issues
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 8:02 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>
> The fast16/fast32 types and limits are still in bits/stdint.h despite
> not varying between archs. Removing those would make bits/stdint.h
> tiny/trivial. Aside from PAGE_SIZE, both bits/limits.h and
> bits/stdint.h would essentially have no information except
> "long/pointer size" and maybe we could even eventually eliminate them
> by having a global idea of "wordsize".
I don't think it's safe to make such assumptions. Our architecture is native 64-bit, so we define all the fast types as 64-bit.
Regards,
Glenn
--
Glenn Weinberg
Vice President, Product
Cognitive Electronics, Inc.
www.cognitive-electronics.com
glenn@...nitive-electronics.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
