[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:44:42 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@...il.com>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl-cross toolchains now unusable in Buildroot
Dear Bryan Hundven,
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 12:05:23 -0800, Bryan Hundven wrote:
> > * The toolchains have the sysroot mechanism disabled. For an unknown
> > reason, in commit
> > https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross/commits/f9c0c3c34f0fe122541a129f1aa87686954d5f1b,
> > the sysroot feature was disabled. This is weird, as essentially all
> > modern toolchains have the sysroot feature enabled. This is
> > essential for Buildroot to use a pre-built toolchain.
>
> musl-cross uses a config.sh to configure the toolchain settings:
> https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross/src/tip/config.sh?at=default
>
> That is where you would set:
> ```
> WITH_SYSROOT=yes
> ```
>
> So, musl-cross does still have sysroot, it just doesn't have it on by default.
> Sysroot support does have a problem with the path, which is described
> with this bug and patch:
> https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross/issue/2/sysroot-configuration-bug
This is of zero interest for Buildroot. In Buildroot, we have two
mechanisms for toolchains:
* What we call the "internal toolchain backend", where Buildroot
builds its own toolchain. This already has the capability of
building musl toolchains, and is completely independent from
musl-cross (except from the fact that we borrowed the gcc patches).
However, this "backend" forces the user to wait a fairly long time
for the toolchain to build.
* What we call the "external toolchain backend", where Buildroot
simply downloads and uses an already existing pre-built toolchain.
This is where the toolchains produced by musl-cross and available at
https://e82b27f594c813a5a4ea5b07b06f16c3777c3b8c.googledrive.com/host/0BwnS5DMB0YQ6bDhPZkpOYVFhbk0/
are nice, because Buildroot simply toolchains the tarball, extracts
it and voila, we have a working Musl toolchain in a few seconds.
So, the fact that musl-cross *allows* to build sysroot-enabled
toolchain is of no use to us, if the toolchain proposed by musl-cross
at
https://e82b27f594c813a5a4ea5b07b06f16c3777c3b8c.googledrive.com/host/0BwnS5DMB0YQ6bDhPZkpOYVFhbk0/
don't have this option enabled.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
