[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:28:40 +0300
From: Sergey Dmitrouk <sdmitrouk@...esssoftek.com>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make musl math depend less on libgcc builtins
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:11:23AM -0700, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> on a correct implementation ==, != are quiet, but <,>,<=,>=
> raise invalid if any of the operands are nan
I wanted to get some details on this, but failed to find relevant
sections of C99/IEEE754 standards. I see C99 referring to IEEE754, is
it in "5.11 Details of comparison predicates" section of IEEE754?
Could you please point me to section(s) I'm apparently missing?
--
Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
