[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:17:01 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] use weak symbols for the POSIX functions that
will be used by C threads
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:46:49PM +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> diff --git a/src/mman/mprotect.c b/src/mman/mprotect.c
> index f488486..535787b 100644
> --- a/src/mman/mprotect.c
> +++ b/src/mman/mprotect.c
> @@ -2,10 +2,12 @@
> #include "libc.h"
> #include "syscall.h"
>
> -int mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot)
> +int __mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot)
> {
> size_t start, end;
> start = (size_t)addr & -PAGE_SIZE;
> end = (size_t)((char *)addr + len + PAGE_SIZE-1) & -PAGE_SIZE;
> return syscall(SYS_mprotect, start, end-start, prot);
> }
> +
> +weak_alias(__mprotect, mprotect);
I'll go ahead and eliminate this one from pthread_create.c like I had
mentioned so we can omit it. Doing so should be a size reduction too,
both locally (syscall is generally cheaper than function call) and for
static linking (since mprotect.o won't get pulled in).
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
