[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:38:58 +0200
From: u-igbb@...ey.se
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: compiling musl with pcc (i486-pc-linux-gnu) (was: compiling
musl on x86_64 linux with pcc)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:46:17AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I have pcc 1.1.0.DEVEL 20130227 with pcc-libs-20130721 and it seems to
> still work fine with current musl. Note that some fixes are needed for
I have got a musl instance compiled with pcc which seems to be usable.
A pcc compiled and linked against it reproduces itself and then
reproduces the same code for musl.
The catch:
Using --enable-optimize=no leads to a broken library (at least
concerning the variadic arguments).
> I just ran libc-test with libc.so built by pcc and confirmed that
> there are no non-math regressions versus gcc-built libc.so. (I did not
> check math in detail because there are lots of known math failures
> that are not serious.)
Now we know that this is possible with the current version as well,
but not without optimization :)
Regards,
Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
