[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:20:56 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: u-igbb@...ey.se
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: compiling musl on x86_64 linux with pcc
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:10:55AM +0200, u-igbb@...ey.se wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > I'd like to also have a tcc-based one but musl seems to be too hard
> > > a target for tcc yet :( sigh.
> >
> > I think tcc has a long ways to go... But pcc was working in the past
> > (at least on 32-bit) and should work.
>
> AFAICT tcc can not even _use_ musl (i.e. build programs to be linked to
> musl) as musl relies on __builtin_va_list.
>
> That's a pity. Wonder whether it would cost too much to make
> __builtin_va_list non-mandatory?
How else would you do it? There's no real alternative.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
