[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:16:36 -0500
From: M Farkas-Dyck <strake888@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New domain!
On 18/04/2014, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> I think it's more just a matter of the practical pros and cons, and
> one issue is establishing name recognition. musl.libc.org establishes
> name recognition for musl and plain libc.org or www.libc.org doesn't.
Like kernel.org. I think they at least ought to have registered
linux.org too, but meh.
> So I'm leaning towards an approach that uses them in conjunction with
> musl.libc.org being the musl site and libc.org being something that's
> not misrepresented as fully independent of musl, but that's also more
> general.
This makes sense.
> Securing a mail system that
> can end up sending outgoing mail is a big deal and really sucks if you
> get it wrong (spam liability).
I doubt whether it's worth the bother. That said, if you think so, I'd
like <strake@...c.org> ☺
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
