[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 18:17:47 +0100
From: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: MUSL_LIBRARY_PATH ?
On 06/04/2014 17:18, Rich Felker wrote:
> The obvious workaround is to put a shell script in place of your
> actual binary, and have it do:
>
> exec "$ldso" -- "foo.bin" "$@"
>
> or similar. Alternatively a minimal static-linked binary could be used
> instead of shell script to make it perform better and eliminate some
> of the risks of shell script processing.
Shameless plug: this is the perfect use case for execline.
http://skarnet.org/software/execline/
An execline script will perform better here than a shell script, without
the risks, and still offer the editability of a script.
--
Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
