[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:06:21 +0200
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Laurent Bercot <ska-dietlibc@...rnet.org>
Subject: Re: linux/netlink.h
On 10/07/2013 12:42 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
>> Your distribution doesn't provide the whole set of linux headers
>> stand-alone?
>
> I can compile my software on top of an existing distribution all
> right. But the point is I'm building my own systems by hand without
> a distribution, which is precisely why I'm interested in musl. And
> it looks like mini-lkh was made for that precise case.
>
the mini-lkh's are really mini... currently they're barely enough to
compile a small subset of busybox.
until they become more sophisticated, you can use sabotage's multi-arch
kernel headers tarball:
http://ftp.barfooze.de/pub/sabotage/tarballs/kernel-headers-3.3.4-1.tar.gz
imo a good alternative to downloading the full kernel sources to compile
the headers.
an additional advantage is that kernel headers are often broken,
the version used by sabotage is known good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
