[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 22:28:31 +0200
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Kirk Terrell <knjterrell@...luelight.com>
Subject: Re: Embedded distro
On 08/03/2013 06:19 PM, Kirk Terrell wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I've been working on a distro that is a fork from the CLFS Embedded
> project that uses musl libc in place of libc. I've managed to boot an
> emulated Vexpress-a9 target using the instructions at
> http://kanj.github.io/elfs/book/armMusl/index.html.
looking at
http://kanj.github.io/elfs/book/armMusl/materials/packages.html it
mentions uclibc, but not musl.
is there a specific reason you use ancient busybox and kernel ?
using busybox 1.20.2 with the patches used by sabotage[1]
would at least give you a completely working sed that can be used to
build anything that depends on sed without having to install gnu's.
[1] https://github.com/rofl0r/sabotage/tree/master/KEEP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
