[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 07:56:21 +0200
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: OIN Notice - Definition Update [license@...ninventionnetwork.com]
On 07/12/2013 07:00 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:32:15PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 05:18:46PM +0100, Justin Cormack wrote:
>>>
>>> Its not a standard, its a list of things that are broadly "Linux" in terms
>>> of the point of the group which is an anti patent pool...
>>
>> OK, I think we may have all misunderstood the point of this list.
>
> I stand by my claim that a crazy person did this. Table 5 contains
> "Sugar Labs," which isn't even a damn software package, it's a
> non-profit that develops the Sugar learning environment. It's like
> claiming freedesktop.org is "linux". I strongly doubt a human being
> actually looked at any part of this before copy-pasting it into their
> website.
Why are we looking at this? They OIN would be quite happy to have musl
into the list and hopefully provide patent cover in case somebody claims
some part musl are patented.
lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
