[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:28:48 +0200
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: go support (was: Best place to discuss other lightweight libraries?)
On 04/24/2013 01:18 PM, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
>
> btw. has anyone used go with musl?
>
i tried to build gcc 4.7.2 with go support (--enable-languages=c,c++,go)
and that fails due to a lack of set/getcontext().
(see pkg/gcc472 in sabotage)
according to rich, adding that to musl requires a non-trivial amount of
arch specific asm.
the go runtime in the gcc tree should be fixed to have a fallback when
this functionality is missing (if possible),
so it maybe be needed to ask on the go mailing list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
