[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:33:00 +0600
From: agent <agentprog@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: STLport
31.12.2012 09:00, Grant Gray пишет:
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl?
> >
> >
> > I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume
> > glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting
> > effort is required to get it working with musl.
>
> Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or
> libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, and
> full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s...
>
> Rich
>
> Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft code,
> which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I have
> no allegiance to STLport so will look into it.
>
> Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl?
>
i have tried to build the whole stack: clang, libc++, libc++abi with
musl, though i got stuck with libunwind for libc++abi. libc++ compiled
fine when using libsupc++, but i didn't test it anyhow (maybe it is even
unusable). i'm going to try out clang + libc++ + libcxxrt + musl
soon.they say libc++ works with libcxxrt and libcxxrt has it's own unwind.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
