[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 02:38:46 +0100
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: lightweight web browsers (was: [ANN] sabotage 0.9.7 milestone
(x86[_64]) release)
On 11/07/2012 07:04 AM, Isaac Dunham wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:34:38 +0100
> John Spencer<maillist-musl@...fooze.de> wrote:
>> still missing:
>> - a desktop browser that comes with minimal dependencies (currently only
>> lynx can be used to browse the interwebs)
> So you don't have Links2 yet?
>
> Dependencies:
> CLI:
> Minimal:
> openssl | gnutls
> ncurses
> Enhancements:
> libz, liblzma, bzip2 (transparent decompression)
> -libz, while optional, should be enabled or some sites won't work.
> GUI:
> Minimal:
> libpng (1.2, NOT 1.5!)
oh, that's bad. i rather not have to have 2 different library versions
around.
> gpm
> At least one of:
> linux-headers (for fbdev) | SDL | X11 headers | svgalib |directfb
> Extra:
> libjpeg, libtiff (more image formats)
>
> You'll need to specify
> CFLAGS="-D_GNU_SOURCE ..." \
> /configure --enable-graphics --with-gpm --with-x --with-fb \
> --x-includes=... --x-libraries=... --with-ssl
>
> to get it to build with GUI. I didn't need patches.
>
> If I recall correctly, Dillo3 can be built if you have fltk1.3.
> It gives you partial CSS support.
does it only depend on fltk or are there more deps ?
> Netsurf would be the other browser to try compiling, IMHO.
this one seems indeed promising, it only lacks JS.
> And it's unfortunate that OWB seems to be gone; it was a WebKit/SDL browser
hmm i vaguely remember that compiling webkit has lots of dependencies,
at least the last time i tried it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
