[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:46:25 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: noexecstack
On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 11:35:36PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> Vasily Kulikov published a patch for nonexecutable stack for glibc in Owl.
>
> http://openwall.com/lists/owl-dev/2012/08/05/1
> http://openwall.com/lists/owl-dev/2012/08/05/3
>
> Should we support this in the musl?
Yes, but there should be a way to do it without putting ugly stuff
like this in every single asm file. Why isn't there a command-line
option to the assembler to do it? Or a way to do it globally with
objcopy?
Better yet, why is executable stack even still supported by Linux at
all?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
