[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:13:47 +0200
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ELLCC and musl
2012/7/9 Richard Pennington <rich@...nware.com>:
> I added a blog post making my switch to musl official. :-)
> http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=135
>
> -Rich
Very cool!
Are the LLVM/Clang related patches from the LLVMlinux project
(http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org )* non-invasive enough to integrate
in ELLCC?
The LLVMlinux project currently targets x86_64, MIPS and ARM so it
seems to be quite similar to the interests of ELLCC.
This could be quite an interesting start of a new self-hosting
linux-based operating system based on musl+LLVM/{clang, libc++} :)
* for an easy overview how one can integrate the patches in a standard
svn build rather than the Makefiles/scripts from the LLVMlinux
project, see PKGBUILD at:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60611
I have still not succeeded in building the x86_64 LLVMlinux kernel,
but it worked before with the LLL project so I will fight some more
with it later when time allows.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
