[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:47:08 +0300
From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9
On 24.4.2012 г. 03:31, Rich Felker wrote:
> I was just looking back at the wishlist for 1.0 dated a little over a
> year ago, and noticing that all but 3 items on it are completed. (The
> incomplete ones are static-linked dlopen support, limited ability to
> load/run glibc-linked apps/libs, and documentation.)
>
> As for 0.9, there was never a formal wishlist, but I've covered all
> the intended areas mentioned as short-term goals in the past few
> release announcements. I think musl could use some more testing
> scrutiny before the big release (we don't want it to be like gcc
> 4.7... :), so I'm going to hold off a bit; please continue to report
> bugs and app compatibility issues so we can get as much working as
> possible, with as few bugs as possible, for 0.9.
There was a talk couple of months about relicensing musl to BSD or
similar license, what happened to that idea?
--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
