[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:09:23 +0200
From: Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: float scanner status, upcoming release
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> And here's the current code (standalone test program) if anybody wants
> to play with it or point out how much single-letter variable names
> suck or whatnot.. :-)
Line 72:
x[k] = x[k]*10 + c-'0';
I don't understand why this read access to x[k] is initialized.
If I change the declaration of local array x[] as:
uint32_t x[KMAX] = { 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1};
then:
$ ./a.out
1.123
...
y = 11.123
Initializing x[] with arbitrary values shouldn't change anything
if it was not used uninitialized, right?
Even if I am getting something wrong here, you can count on me
to test the heck out of your function. I initially subscribed to
the musl mailing because I had been looking for a function like
this (although I let the musl source code distract me then).
Pascal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
