Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:59:11 +0000
From: Thomas Van Tongerloo <Thomas.VanTongerloo@...es.com>
To: "lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com" <lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: LKRG Debian jessie

Since the original question was related to Debian, I can confirm lkrg-main compiles and runs fine on Debian Stretch, tested this morning on:

	Linux XXX-DebianXX 4.9.0-5-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u2 (2018-01-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux


Thomas


-----Original Message-----
From: Xavier Sheperd [mailto:xavier.sheperd@....com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 8:44 PM
To: lkrg-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [lkrg-users] LKRG Debian jessie

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +0100, Adam Zabrocki wrote:
>> CentOS6:
>> # uname -a
>> Linux centos6 2.6.32-696.20.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 17:51:45 
>> UTC 2018
>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>We are not supporting kernels 2.6.

Ack.

>
>CentOS 7 with 3.10 kernel is easy to run - remove get_random_long() 
>declaration made by LKRG. This kernel backported patches with kernel declaration of it.
>

lkrg-main builds without errors, lkrg-experimental with 1 warning.
Both load and run fine.

>Thanks,
>Adam

Thank you for your help.
Xavier

P.S. I added the build logs, in case the details are useful.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ