[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 10:28:40 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 7/7] arm64: Drop unneeded stackleak_check_alloca()
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:17:04AM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
> Drop stackleak_check_alloca() for arm64 since the STACKLEAK gcc plugin now
> doesn't track stack depth overflow caused by alloca().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 22 ----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Thanks,
Will
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 7f1628e..740b31f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -493,25 +493,3 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
> {
> current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0;
> }
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
> -void __used stackleak_check_alloca(unsigned long size)
> -{
> - unsigned long stack_left;
> - unsigned long current_sp = current_stack_pointer;
> - struct stack_info info;
> -
> - BUG_ON(!on_accessible_stack(current, current_sp, &info));
> -
> - stack_left = current_sp - info.low;
> -
> - /*
> - * There's a good chance we're almost out of stack space if this
> - * is true. Using panic() over BUG() is more likely to give
> - * reliable debugging output.
> - */
> - if (size >= stack_left)
> - panic("alloca() over the kernel stack boundary\n");
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(stackleak_check_alloca);
> -#endif
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
