[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:35:18 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: kpark3469@...il.com
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, keescook@...omium.org,
james.morse@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] usercopy: reimplement arch_within_stack_frames
Hi Sahara,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:19:47PM +0400, kpark3469@...il.com wrote:
> From: Sahara <keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae>
>
> This series of patches introduce the arm64 arch_within_stack_frames
> implementation using stacktrace functions. Also the base code is
> moved from thread_info.h to stacktrace.h. x86 code is reimplemented
> to use frame pointer unwinder functions.
What's the status on this series? I'm ok taking the arm64 patch from James
to bring us up to speed with x86, but it doesn't make sense without the
first patch in the series because the arch callback is out-of-line.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
