[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 23:36:52 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: ctr - avoid VLA use
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:18:58PM +0100, Salvatore Mesoraca wrote:
>
> +#define MAX_BLOCKSIZE 16
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +#define MAX_ALIGNMASK 15
> +#else
> +#define MAX_ALIGNMASK 0
> +#endif
> +
Hmm, this won't work. Just because you have efficient unaligned
access in general doesn't mean that every implementation can live
with unaligned access. In particular, on x86 there are quite a
few implementations that require alignment or they will fault.
So please just make it 15 unconditionally.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
