Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 07:10:47 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>, 
	"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, 
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, 
	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>, 
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>, Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel.h: Skip single-eval logic on literals in min()/max()

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 04:07 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:05:36 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> When max() is used in stack array size calculations from literal values
>>> (e.g. "char foo[max(sizeof(struct1), sizeof(struct2))]", the compiler
>>> thinks this is a dynamic calculation due to the single-eval logic, which
>>> is not needed in the literal case. This change removes several accidental
>>> stack VLAs from an x86 allmodconfig build:
>>>
>>> $ diff -u before.txt after.txt | grep ^-
>>> -drivers/input/touchscreen/cyttsp4_core.c:871:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘ids’ [-Wvla]
>>> -fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c:344:4: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘namebuf’ [-Wvla]
>>> -lib/vsprintf.c:747:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘sym’ [-Wvla]
>>> -net/ipv4/proc.c:403:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff’ [-Wvla]
>>> -net/ipv6/proc.c:198:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff’ [-Wvla]
>>> -net/ipv6/proc.c:218:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘buff64’ [-Wvla]
>>>
>>> Based on an earlier patch from Josh Poimboeuf.
>>
>> v1, v2 and v3 of this patch all fail with gcc-4.4.4:
>>
>> ./include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_delta_to_clock_t':
>> ./include/linux/jiffies.h:444: error: first argument to '__builtin_choose_expr' not a constant
>
>
> I'm seeing that problem with
>> gcc --version
> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5

Same here, 4.8.5 fails. gcc 5.4.1 seems to work. I compiled a minimal
5.1.0 and it seems to work as well.

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.