Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:28:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Geo Kozey <geokozey@...lfence.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
Cc: Kernel-hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Linux Security <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] capability: introduce sysctl
 for controlled user-ns capability whitelist

> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> 
> The default value set (for kernel.controlled_userns_caps_whitelist) is
> CAP_FULL_SET indicating that no capability is controlled by default to
> maintain compatibility with the existing behavior of user-ns. Administrator
> will have to modify this sysctl to control any capability as such. e.g. to
> control CAP_NET_RAW the mask need to be changed like -
> 
>   # sysctl -q kernel.controlled_userns_caps_whitelist
>   kernel.controlled_userns_caps_whitelist = 1f,ffffffff
>   # sysctl -w kernel.controlled_userns_caps_whitelist=1f,ffffdfff
>   kernel.controlled_userns_caps_whitelist = 1f,ffffdfff
> 
> For bit-to-mask conversion please check include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> file.

Is it possible to make those sysctl values human readable? That would make
admins life easier.

Yours sincerely

G. K.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.