[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:14:59 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [printk] 7f7c60e066: BUG:KASAN:slab-out-of-bounds
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:22 AM, kernel test robot
<xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-4.9):
>
> commit: 7f7c60e0663645e757e520245606fde9c6e326bb ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tobin-C-Harding/printk-hash-addresses-printed-with-p/20171024-231922
It's not clear to me which of the various versions this test ran
against, but it seems like the printf self-tests got very confused by
the results:
> [ 40.275423] test_printf: kvasprintf(..., "%p %p", ...) returned '3cf9adbe eff717bf', expected '0000000001234567 fffffffffedcba98'
> [ 40.296739] test_printf: vsnprintf(buf, 256, "|%-*p|%*p|", ...) returned 19, expected 39
> [ 40.322776] test_printf: vsnprintf(buf, 16, "|%-*p|%*p|", ...) returned 19, expected 39
> [ 40.334834] test_printf: vsnprintf(buf, 0, "|%-*p|%*p|", ...) returned 19, expected 39
I assume v10 will fix the width issues, but probably not the value tests...
And it claims a use-after-free, too:
> [ 39.757461] The buggy address belongs to the object at 22cb34bb
> [ 39.757461] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-32 of size 32
> [ 39.757461] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of
> [ 39.757461] 32-byte region [22cb34bb, 24ac3a60)
Which becomes rather unreadable, since the address got hashed. :P
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
