[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:25:59 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/30] xfs: Define usercopy region in xfs_inode slab cache
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> If you are touching multiple filesystems, you really should cc the
> entire patchset to linux-fsdevel, similar to how you sent the entire
> patchset to lkml. That way the entire series will end up on a list
> that almost all fs developers read. LKML is not a list you can rely
> on all filesystem developers reading (or developers in any other
> subsystem, for that matter)...
Okay, sounds good. Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
