[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:42:31 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: igor.stoppa@...wei.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com, keescook@...omium.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Cc: paul@...l-moore.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, hch@...radead.org,
labbott@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option
Igor Stoppa wrote:
> Who decides when enough is enough, meaning that all the needed modules
> are loaded?
> Should I provide an interface to user-space? A sysfs entry?
No such interface is needed. Just an API for applying set_memory_rw()
and set_memory_ro() on LSM hooks is enough.
security_add_hooks() can call set_memory_rw() before adding hooks and
call set_memory_ro() after adding hooks. Ditto for security_delete_hooks()
for SELinux's unregistration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
