[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 22:35:20 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ast@...com, Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Shubham Bansal
<illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shubham Bansal
>> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
>>> I would post them as soon as I test them on ARMv5 and ARMv6. If you
>>> can help me with that, please let me know.
>>
>> Please post what you have: it would be better to see what you've got
>> now in case additional changes are needed so you don't have to do it
>> again on v5 and v6. Also, it means other people with real v5 and v6
>> hardware could test for you if they were so inclined, and you won't
>> need to be blocked on doing the tests in qemu.
>>
>> You can send it as an "RFC" in the subject, just to make sure people
>> know it's not considered fully done. :)
>
> I already have ARMv5 and ARMv6 code written. I just haven't tested it
> yet. Should i send the patch with those as well ?
Sure, just to have a version up for people to examine. If there are
bugs, that's fine, we'll iron them out.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
