[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:10:44 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] proc: add proc_fs_info struct to store proc options
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> wrote:
> This is a preparation patch that adds a proc_fs_info to be able to store
> different procfs options. Right now some mount options are stored inside
> the pid namespace which make multiple proc share the same mount options.
> This patch will help also to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>
> static struct dentry *proc_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data)
> {
> + int error;
> + struct super_block *sb;
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
> + struct proc_fs_info *fs_info;
> +
> + if (!(flags & MS_KERNMOUNT) && !ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
Why is this check needed?
> diff --git a/include/linux/proc_fs.h b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> index 2d2bf59..e1cb9c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> @@ -6,11 +6,27 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/refcount.h>
> +
> +enum {
> + PROC_FS_V1 = 1,
> + PROC_FS_V2 = 2,
> +};
> +
> +struct proc_fs_info {
> + refcount_t users;
> + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns;
> + kgid_t pid_gid;
> + int hide_pid;
> + int version;
> +};
What is version?
Should this patch have just users and pid_ns and move the other stuff
to patch 2?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
