[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:59:40 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Cc: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] module: verify address is read-only
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com> wrote:
> +++ Kees Cook [23/03/17 14:13 -0700]:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in
>>> the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the exsiting functions
>>> that test if an address is inside a module's text section.
>>>
>>> Functions that take a module as an argument will be able to
>>> verify that the module is in a read-only section.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>
>>
>>
>> Awesome! I'll be glad to have these.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>
>> Jessica, if this looks good to you, should this go via modules or via
>> my tree? If mine, can I have your Ack?
>
>
> Sure, would be happy to let you take this patch through your tree. I
> only had a few minor comments left, so I think just one more small
> respin and it'll be good to go.
Awesome, I'll wait for v4 and your Ack and put it through the kspp tree. :)
Thanks for the review!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
