[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:40:03 -0700
From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 08:14:44AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Okay well then people are fine with a BUG_ON approach. I will do a
>> next iteration tailored to that. I will also try to add the static
>> inline suggestion from Peter.
>
> Would it be possible, please, to refrain from top-posting when replying
> on the ML?
>
> You sometimes reply inline and after the text and sometimes at the top.
> This subthread has both variants and it is really annoying to people
> like me who try to follow the discussion.
Sure, I will try to always reply inline. Sorry bad habits.
--
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
