[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:35:30 -0800
From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:56:49AM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>> > We generally stick to lower case for the arm64 assembly macros. If we
>> > need this, we should stick to the existing convention.
>> >
>> >> +/* Similar to set_fs(USER_DS) in verify_pre_usermode_state without a warning. */
>> >> +.macro VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE
>> >> + mov x1, #TASK_SIZE_64
>> >> + str x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
>> >> +.endm
>> >
>> > We need arm64's set_fs() to configure UAO, too, so this is much weaker
>> > than set_fs(), and will leave __{get,put}_user and
>> > __copy_{to,from}_user() able to access kernel memory.
>> >
>> > We don't currently have an asm helper to clear UAO, and unconditionally
>> > poking that on exception return is liable to be somewhat expensive.
>> >
>> > Also, given we're only trying to catch this in syscalls, I'm afraid I
>> > don't see what we gain by doing this in the entry assembly.
>> >
>>
>> I optimized all architectures from the arm (32-bit) discussion. I will
>> come back to a simple bl to the verify function. Thanks!
>
> I wouldn't call what you've done on ARM an "optimisation", because my
> comment about making the fast path worthless still stands.
Why does it still stands on the latest proposal?
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
--
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
