Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:54:36 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<will.deacon@....com>, <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	<andre.przywara@....com>, <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>, <james.morse@....com>,
	<keescook@...omium.org>, <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: mmu: move TLB maintenance from callers to
 create_mapping_late()

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 08:23:03PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> In preparation of changing the way we invoke create_mapping_late() (which
> is currently invoked twice from the same function), move the TLB flushing
> it performs from the caller into create_mapping_late() itself, and change
> it to a TLB maintenance by VA rather than a full flush, which is more
> appropriate here.

It's not immediately clear what's meant by "changing the way we invoke
create_mapping_late()" here.

It's probably worth explicitly mentioning that we need to add another
caller of create_mapping_late(), and this saves us adding (overly
strong) TLB maintenance to all callers.

> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 2131521ddc24..9e0ec1a8cd3b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -356,6 +356,9 @@ static void create_mapping_late(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
>  
>  	__create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot,
>  			     NULL, debug_pagealloc_enabled());
> +
> +	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
> +	flush_tlb_kernel_range(virt, virt + size);
>  }

It feels  a little odd to have the maintenance here given we still call
this *create*_mapping_late.

Given the only users of this are changing permissions, perhaps we should
rename this to change_mapping_prot(), or something like that?

Otherwise, this looks fine to me, and boots fine. Either way:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Thanks,
Mark.

>  static void __init __map_memblock(pgd_t *pgd, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> @@ -438,9 +441,6 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>  	create_mapping_late(__pa_symbol(__start_rodata), (unsigned long)__start_rodata,
>  			    section_size, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
>  
> -	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
> -	flush_tlb_all();
> -
>  	debug_checkwx();
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.