[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:01:36 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Scott Bauer <sbauer@....utah.edu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>, "Daniel J . Bernstein" <djb@...yp.to>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] siphash: add cryptographically secure hashtable function
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> + switch (left) {
> + case 7: b |= ((u64)data[6]) << 48;
> + case 6: b |= ((u64)data[5]) << 40;
> + case 5: b |= ((u64)data[4]) << 32;
> + case 4: b |= ((u64)data[3]) << 24;
> + case 3: b |= ((u64)data[2]) << 16;
> + case 2: b |= ((u64)data[1]) << 8;
> + case 1: b |= ((u64)data[0]); break;
> + case 0: break;
> + }
The above is extremely inefficient. Considering that most kernel data
would be expected to be smallish, that matters (ie the usual benchmark
would not be about hashing megabytes of data, but instead millions of
hashes of small data).
I think this could be rewritten (at least for 64-bit architectures) as
#ifdef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
if (left)
b |= le64_to_cpu(load_unaligned_zeropad(data) &
bytemask_from_count(left));
#else
.. do the duff's device thing with the switch() ..
#endif
which should give you basically perfect code generation (ie a single
64-bit load and a byte mask).
Totally untested, just looking at the code and trying to make sense of it.
... and obviously, it requires an actual high-performance use-case to
make any difference.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
