[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:36:25 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
Cc: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 13.1/13] lkdtm: add tests for atomic over-/underflow
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:41:34PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Reshetova, Elena
>> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Thank you Kees! I applied the commit to our hardened_atomic_on_next branch and it will be included into the next rfc.
>>
>> Cool, thanks. I assume this should get atomic64_t and local_t tests as well?
>>
>
> Yes, I'm currently compiling a build with atomic64_t and local_t tests added.
> With the improved lkdtm macros its much easier to add the extra types, thank
> you Kees!
Sure thing! I may have yet-another patch for this, as I didn't like
repeating the same things in three files whenever a new test was
added. Moar macro magick!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
