Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 07:47:21 -0700
From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, 
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, 
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, 
	Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, 
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, 
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86/KASLR: Increase BRK pages for KASLR memory randomization

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Mika Penttilä
<mika.penttila@...tfour.com> wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 09:40 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Default implementation expects 6 pages maximum are needed for low page
>> allocations. If KASLR memory randomization is enabled, the worse case
>> of e820 layout would require 12 pages (no large pages). It is due to the
>> PUD level randomization and the variable e820 memory layout.
>>
>> This bug was found while doing extensive testing of KASLR memory
>> randomization on different type of hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> Based on next-20160805
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> index 6209289..3a27e6a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,14 @@ void  __init early_alloc_pgt_buf(void)
>>       unsigned long tables = INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE;
>>       phys_addr_t base;
>>
>> +     /*
>> +      * Depending on the machine e860 memory layout and the PUD alignement.
>> +      * We may need twice more pages when KASLR memoy randomization is
>> +      * enabled.
>> +      */
>> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY))
>> +             tables *= 2;
>> +
>>       base = __pa(extend_brk(tables, PAGE_SIZE));
>>
>>       pgt_buf_start = base >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>
> You should increase the reserve also :
> RESERVE_BRK(early_pgt_alloc, INIT_PGT_BUF_SIZE);

Yes, that's right. I will resend v2 changing INIT_PGD_BUF_SIZE.

>
>
> --Mika
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.