|
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:35:59 +0300 From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm: Hardened usercopy Hi Kees, On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:25:21PM -0400, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:25:20PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR > > > > Should be CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY to match the slab/slub implementation > > condition. > > > >> +const char *__check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, > >> + struct page *page); > >> +#else > >> +static inline const char *__check_heap_object(const void *ptr, > >> + unsigned long n, > >> + struct page *page) > >> +{ > >> + return NULL; > >> +} > >> +#endif > > Hmm, I think what I have is correct: if the allocator supports the > heap object checking, it defines __check_heap_object as existing via > CONFIG_HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR. If usercopy checking is done > at all is controlled by CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY. > > I.e. you can have the other usercopy checks even if your allocator > doesn't support object size checking. Right. I missed the fact that usercopy.c build also depends on CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY. Sorry for the noise. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.