Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:54:23 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad

Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> > ????  I assume you're assuming that the rxrpc_skb_priv struct contents can
> > arbitrarily replaced temporarily...
> 
> Of course you can, it's per-skb state.

I'm using the per-skb state for my own purposes and might be looking at it
elsewhere at the same time.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.