Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:18:18 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, 
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, 
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, 
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] mm: Move memcg stack accounting to account_kernel_stack

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:00:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> We should account for stacks regardless of stack size.  Move it into
>> account_kernel_stack.
>>
>> Fixes: 12580e4b54ba8 ("mm: memcontrol: report kernel stack usage in cgroup2 memory.stat")
>> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/fork.c | 15 ++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>> index be7f006af727..cd2abe6e4e41 100644
>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>> @@ -165,20 +165,12 @@ static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>       struct page *page = alloc_kmem_pages_node(node, THREADINFO_GFP,
>>                                                 THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>>
>> -     if (page)
>> -             memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(page, MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK,
>> -                                         1 << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> -
>>       return page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
>>  }
>>
>>  static inline void free_thread_info(struct thread_info *ti)
>>  {
>> -     struct page *page = virt_to_page(ti);
>> -
>> -     memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(page, MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK,
>> -                                 -(1 << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER));
>> -     __free_kmem_pages(page, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>> +     free_kmem_pages((unsigned long)ti, THREAD_SIZE_ORDER);
>>  }
>>  # else
>>  static struct kmem_cache *thread_info_cache;
>> @@ -227,6 +219,11 @@ static void account_kernel_stack(struct thread_info *ti, int account)
>>
>>       mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
>>                           THREAD_SIZE / 1024 * account);
>> +
>> +     /* All stack pages belong to the same memcg. */
>> +     memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(
>> +             virt_to_page(ti), MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK,
>> +             account * (THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE));
>>  }
>
> Won't this be broken in the case where THREAD_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE?

In my defense, it was broken before this change, too.  Sigh.  I'll
change this to count in KiB too.

As far as I can tell, this thing is used for display only.

--Andy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.