[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:42:48 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>,
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>, Emrah Demir <ed@...sec.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kaslr: allow kASLR to be default over Hibernation
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
> On Thu 2016-04-14 13:14:07, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> Since kASLR and Hibernation can not currently coexist at runtime
>> >> on x86, the default behavior was to disable kASLR by default when
>> >> CONFIG_HIBERNATION was present (to retain original behavior).
>> >>
>> >> The behavior of kASLR on arm64 (and soon MIPS) is to be enabled by
>> >> default when selected at build time. Since arm64 Hibernation does not
>> >> conflict with kASLR, this fixes the hibernation argument parsing to be
>> >> x86-specific. Additionally, since end users want to be able to select
>> >> kASLR on x86 by default at build time, create CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE_ON
>> >> that is present only on x86.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> >
>> > I believe this is bad idea. arm64 shows that kaslr and hibernation can
>> > coexist, and hibernation is still useful when your battery runs out.
>>
>> What? I'm confused -- this patch leaves the x86 behavior as-is by
>> default but allows hibernation to work with arm64. (For example, right
>> now, if you boot arm64 with "kaslr" kernel argument, hibernation will
>> get needlessly disabled.)
>
> So it is very different from the PATCH v1, still it shares the
> subject?
It was similar, but not the same:
v1: Prefer kASLR over Hibernation
v2: kaslr: allow kASLR to be default over Hibernation
I'm happy to call it whatever you like, though! :)
> This is the part I don't like:
>
>> >> Since kASLR and Hibernation can not currently coexist at runtime
>> >> on x86, the default behavior was to disable kASLR by default when
>> >> CONFIG_HIBERNATION was present (to retain original behavior).
>
> Now I notice that it is quite unclear if it actually changes
> anything...
Okay, right. So, there are a few problems that this patch is solving,
and maybe it needs to be broken up into separate patches, but it
didn't seem like it to me at the time. Specifically:
1) The x86 hibernation and KASLR code don't play well together currently.
"1" was worked around so that both could be built in, but only one
would be active at a time. This lead to:
2) The general hibernation code contains kernel arguments that should
only affect x86.
And we have the desire by folks to have KASLR enabled by default on
x86, giving us:
3) There is no build-time way on x86 to switch the preference of KASLR
vs hibernation.
I think "2" should be solved for this release, since arm64 KASLR is
landing, and mistakenly booting an arm64 system with "kaslr" on the
command line will needlessly disable hibernation.
3 and 2 are a result of 1, and IIUC, you're saying you want to solve 1
to make everything else go away? My only concern with that idea is
that I don't (yet) have the knowledge of x86 hibernation internals to
fix this, and it'll take a while to get to having KASLR on by default
if we have to wait on me to fix hibernation. (I'm not saying I
won't/can't, it's just that it'll take me time to come up to speed on
it.)
That do you think?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
