[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:13:44 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Only call /sbin/bridge-stp for the initial
network namespace
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 22:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index 5396ff08af32..742fa89528ab 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
> char *envp[] = { NULL };
> struct net_bridge_port *p;
>
> - r = call_usermodehelper(BR_STP_PROG, argv, envp, UMH_WAIT_PROC);
> + r = -ENOENT;
> + if (dev_net(br->dev) == &init_net)
net_eq ?
> + r = call_usermodehelper(BR_STP_PROG, argv, envp,
> UMH_WAIT_PROC);
>
> spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
>
Otherwise, ack, so far.
As our /sys interfaces directories are tagged by the net namespace it
would actually make sense to run bridge-stp automatically in another
name space.
Bye,
Hannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
