Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:39:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
        Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
        Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
        Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: relocs: build separate 32/64-bit tools

On 04/16/2013 03:38 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> Have simple wrapper files which do:
>>
>> /* relocs_32.c */
>> #define ELF_BITS 32
>> #include "relocs.c"
>>
>> /* relocs_64.c */
>> #define ELF_BITS 64
>> #include "relocs.c"
> 
> That's what I did in my first pass, but it seemed even worse to me. I
> will go back to this.
> 

Actually, I'm trying to see if I can refactor this into one binary.
Hang on a few.

	-hpa


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.