[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:16:33 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Readonly GDT
Right... the TSS does get written to during a task switch.
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10.04.13 at 02:43, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> OK, thinking about the GDT here.
>>
>> The GDT is quite small -- 256 bytes on i386, 128 bytes on x86-64. As
>> such, we probably don't want to allocate a full page to it for only
>> that. This means that in order to create a readonly mapping we have
>to
>> pack GDTs from different CPUs together in the same pages, *or* we
>> tolerate that other things on the same page gets reflected in the
>same
>> mapping.
>
>I think a read-only GDT is incompatible with exceptions delivered
>through task gates (i.e. double fault on 32-bit), so I would assume
>this needs to remain a 64-bit only thing.
>
>> However, the packing solution has the advantage of reducing address
>> space consumption which matters on 32 bits: even on i386 we can
>easily
>> burn a megabyte of address space for 4096 processors, but burning 16
>> megabytes starts to hurt.
>
>Packing would have the additional benefit of Xen not needing to
>become a special case in yet another area (because pages
>containing live descriptor table entries need to be read-only for
>PV guests, and need to consist of only descriptor table entries).
>
>Jan
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
