[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:17:37 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>,
Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: kernel base offset ASLR
On 04/05/2013 01:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> The cost of 64-bit RIPs is probably measurable both in cache footprint and
> in execution speed.
>
Well, "probably" usually translates to "worth measuring" to me.
> Random runtime shuffling of the kernel image - is that possible with
> existing toolchains?
I wanted to point out... yes this is hard, but it has the ability to be
*much* stronger than any other form of KASLR simply because it means
that a single infoleak doesn't give everything else away.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
