Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:02:02 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening mailing list

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote:
> The charter of the workgroup is to provide on-going security 
> verification of Linux kernel subsystems in order to assist in securing 
> the Linux Kernel and maintain trust and confidence in the security of 
> the Linux ecosystem.
> 
> This may include, but is not limited to, topics such as tooling to 
> assist in securing the Linux Kernel, verification and testing of 
> critical subsystems for vulnerabilities, security improvements for build 
> tools, and providing guidance for maintaining subsystem security.
> 
> Would it be okay if we used the kernel-hardening mailing list for 
> communication?

Of course!  Please do.

> If our traffic ever gets to be too much

This would be a good problem to have (well, assuming that list traffic
correlates with actual progress).

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.